Page Summary
petra - (no subject)
ride_4ever - (no subject)
petra - (no subject)
ride_4ever - (no subject)
petra - (no subject)
ride_4ever - (no subject)
petra - (no subject)
ride_4ever - (no subject)
clevermanka - (no subject)
ride_4ever - (no subject)
clevermanka - (no subject)
ride_4ever - (no subject)
clevermanka - (no subject)
ride_4ever - (no subject)
clevermanka - (no subject)
Active Entries
- 1: PSA: beware this scam: it's not AO3
- 2: Fannish 50 Challenge 2025: Post # 17: Postal Mail from Fen
- 3: PSA: a resistance protest list via sage
- 4: Fannish 50 Challenge 2025: Post # 15: Dreamwidth Fandom
- 5: Fannish 50 Challenge 2025: Post # 16: Dreamwidth Fandom
- 6: Fannish 50 Challenge 2025: Post # 14: Canada Fandom
- 7: Fannish 50 Challenge 2025: Post # 13: Postal Mail from Fen
- 8: Fannish 50 Challenge 2025: Post # 11: Neurodiversity Fandom & Poetry Fandom & Canada Fandom
- 9: PSA: Political: National Day of Action on Saturday, April 5
- 10: Fannish 50 Challenge 2025: Post # 10: Postal Mail from Fen
Style Credit
- Base style: Dusty Foot by
- Theme: Monochrome Purple by
Expand Cut Tags
No cut tags
no subject
Date: 2017-04-23 02:07 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2017-04-23 04:22 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2017-04-23 12:28 pm (UTC)It's important to note that "racist" here does not mean "openly says negative things about nonwhite people." I have never met F., but I assume that as an intelligent modern person who interacts with a varied group of people, she wouldn't do that.
The oft-cited 16K meta is here. I'm much more interested in the comments than the meta itself, because they show what people other than F. think of her thoughts. In this shorter piece of meta she begins an analysis of why Star Wars: The Force Awakens fandom ships two white evil dudes over two heroes who are not white with an assumption that the cause isn't racism. Various people point out flaws in her meta that come from her dismissal of racism, and if she ever addressed those points the comments have been deleted.
If someone writes something, is informed of her implicit biases, does nothing about them, and then wants money to make a film about not being racist, that's a problem. She doesn't have to put a Confederate flag on her blog for me to say she's unqualified to speak for people of color, or that her participation in a project about people of color is questionable.
If she's trying to learn, that's laudable, but making a film shouldn't be her first step into listening to nonwhite people. She's got plenty of people trying to point out issues in her logic on the AO3 meta. If she didn't want the education for free, nobody should pay her so she can learn.
no subject
Date: 2017-04-23 04:45 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2017-04-23 04:57 pm (UTC)In cases like F.'s, I believe the relevant phrase is "intent doesn't matter." If someone does something or says something that's identifiable to other people as biased, and does not work to understand that bias and how to avoid it in future, then they get marked down in the "Not Trying To Do It Right" column.
I have a tendency to presume the best of everyone until proven otherwise. Please notice I didn't and won't call in angry fans of color to tell you why you might not wish to endorse F.'s project. In the first place, they have other things to do and I can copy links with the best of 'em. In the second, I figured you didn't know about the layers of history F. has accumulated in this arena, and I was right.
I'm sorry a reader's offense at the use of spirit animals has made you afraid. The only defense I know of against giving offense of that sort is to do your research, write with awareness, find people from the cultural background you're writing about, engage with them honestly, and take their feedback to heart before you publish something.
no subject
Date: 2017-04-23 07:09 pm (UTC)Sometimes there is no telling what will offend someone. I deleted the fic that made the one single reference to the Raven being Erik's spirit animal. It's due South canon so I still don't really get why it set that person off (btw, the person who harshed on me was a white person, so even more mystifying to me).
Also, I have been harshed on for writing Jewish!Fraser fic where the commenter said I was being "insensitive to the sensibilities of Jewish people". I stood my ground on that one because...duh...I am Jewish by birth.
no subject
Date: 2017-04-23 07:35 pm (UTC)As for being insensitive to the sensibilities of Jewish people, oy vey. Though now I want to poke one of my Jewish friends who is fascinated by golem into writing Fraser as a golem.
no subject
Date: 2017-04-23 09:21 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2017-04-24 02:38 pm (UTC)As for your unease with being called out for the use of "spirit animal," I think it's important to remember that canon isn't always everything. There are many things in canon (for all sorts of shows) that we as fans can and should critique and not utilize or perpetuate in our own creations. It sucks being called out for something, but I try to remember that it sucks worse having one's culture appropriated in media and then again in fan-produced media. I also try to remind myself that when someone calls me out on something it's because they care enough about me, my product, and the original material, to say something. So I swallow my pride and pledge to do better in the future.
no subject
Date: 2017-04-25 05:04 am (UTC)When you spoke with F, was it at a fancon? (I'm asking that only because I'm wondering if you and I have been at some same con and either met unknowingly or else perhaps missed meeting.)
no subject
Date: 2017-04-25 01:27 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2017-04-25 07:26 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2017-04-25 09:24 pm (UTC)Also, in regards to the general issue at hand, I don't want to give the impression that I'm telling people they shouldn't support this film. It could be that Franzeska has worked out her issues with fans of color and everything's hunky-dory and it'll be great. I just think it's important that anyone giving them money should probably know there's some capital-h-History there....
no subject
Date: 2017-04-25 10:13 pm (UTC)Also TYK for giving me the Con*Strict link. If the con is annual, maybe I could go in 2018 (all my 2017 time off from work for cons has already been allocated to Escapade, TGIF/F, ConneXions, and VividCon). I saw two familiar names when I checked the Con*Strict attendee list (well, two more along with you):
no subject
Date: 2017-04-26 01:57 pm (UTC)