[syndicated profile] verushka70tumblr_feed

rabbitindisguise:

honorary-twat:

soleilsplanet:

do you ever just … picture a whole scene, a whole fanfiction in your head, you know how to place every single word of the english dictionary that you need (or your language dictionary), you know how to structure your sentences, you know just what your characters are going to say to each other and then… and then you just open microsoft word.

Its the doc! The blank document steals the ideas from. Your brain!!!! If you want to keep your ideas,, do NOT look at the doc when you open it, look STRAIGHT* AT THE KEYBOARD and write the first words to pop into your head! Once the document isn’t empty it, takes away its evil power over you

two things:

  1. the mental image of that is hilarious
  2. it might just work
[syndicated profile] verushka70tumblr_feed

underestimated-heroine:

curiosityisunderrated:

yourreddancer:

sSoeondrtpf4c522l9fl918h5a1ug65713ugmu731utgh0hllg84l47c2lc6  · 

Elizabeth MacDonough doesn’t give fiery speeches on the Senate floor. She doesn’t pound podiums, tweet clapbacks, or beg for airtime on cable news. Most people couldn’t pick her out of a photo lineup. But this week, she did more to derail Donald Trump’s legislative fever dream than any Democrat in Congress. With nothing but a binder, a brain, and a spine forged from 230 years of procedural precedent, she calmly gutted the “Big, Beautiful Bill” — and sent the Republican Party into a frothing, incandescent rage.

Here’s the part that should terrify the GOP: she’s not even elected. She’s the Senate Parliamentarian, the nonpartisan referee responsible for interpreting the arcane rulebook that governs the world’s most dysfunctional deliberative body. She doesn’t write laws. She doesn’t vote. She doesn’t grandstand. Her job is simple: enforce the rules, no matter who’s in charge. And when Republicans tried to use reconciliation — a fast-track process meant for tweaking budgets — to shove through a far-right wishlist of land seizures, healthcare rollbacks, and anti-trans cruelty, she read the fine print and dropped the hammer.

The “Big, Beautiful Bill” was supposed to be Trump’s magnum opus: a tax-slashing, Medicaid-burning, land-devouring beast of a bill that would reshape America in his image. It included everything from selling off millions of acres of federal public land to states and private developers, to gutting Medicaid for low-income families, immigrants, and trans people, to defunding Planned Parenthood and hacking away at environmental protections like they were weeds in a billionaire’s backyard. It was grotesque. It was rushed. And it was entirely dependent on sliding past Senate rules without a fight.

Elizabeth MacDonough was the fight. She reviewed the bill’s contents and ruled — piece by piece — that major provisions violated the Byrd Rule, which bars unrelated ideological junk from hitching a ride on budget bills. The land sell-off? Not budgetary. Out. The Medicaid provider tax cap? Out. The bans on gender-affirming care, immigrant coverage, and ACA subsidies? Out. The GOP was left holding a gutted husk, their legislative trophy reduced to a few tax cuts and a pile of redacted dreams.

This wasn’t sabotage. This was MacDonough doing her job — the job she’s held since 2012, appointed under a Democratic majority, and respected by both parties until it became inconvenient. She is the Senate’s quiet guardian of process, a civil servant who doesn’t answer to polls, Super PACs, or social media mobs. Her loyalty is to the rules — even as the people around her treat those rules like a hotel minibar. She doesn’t flinch. She doesn’t yield. She simply reads the law and applies it, with the precision of a scalpel and the force of a freight train.

And oh, how the GOP hates her for it.

Mike Lee, who tried to shove his public lands fire sale into the bill like it was a foreclosure listing, is already scrambling to rewrite the language and sneak it back in. Trump, fuming from whatever taxpayer-funded golf course he’s currently defiling, is screaming about “deep state rule tyrants.” Senate Majority Leader John Thune is getting asked uncomfortable questions about whether it’s time to “review” the Parliamentarian’s role — a polite way of saying, “Can we fire her for being smarter than us?”

Because that’s the rub. They didn’t lose because the Democrats outmaneuvered them. They didn’t lose because of public pressure or media backlash. They lost because a woman they barely understand said, quite plainly, “You can’t do that.” And when they asked why, she handed them the rulebook. And when they tried to argue, she pointed to precedent. And when they blustered, she didn’t even blink.

Elizabeth MacDonough has no political agenda. That’s what makes her so dangerous to people who do. She exists outside their theater. She answers to no party. And yet, she is currently one of the most powerful people in Washington — not because she makes the laws, but because she refuses to let anyone break them.

So no, she didn’t kill the Big, Beautiful Bill. The GOP killed it themselves — by trying to use budget procedure as a battering ram for authoritarian fantasy. MacDonough simply told the truth. And in 2025, that might be the most radical thing anyone in government can do.

Let the Republicans rant. Let them plot her removal. Let them rewrite their monstrosities and try again. But remember this: when the bulldozers were revving, when the Medicaid cuts were inked, and when Trump’s wrecking ball of a bill was barreling toward the American people — it wasn’t a senator who stopped it. It wasn’t a protest. It was a woman with a binder and a backbone.

We see you, Elizabeth. And we thank you.

FUCK YES, ELIZABETH!!!!

Some articles on this. Not sure what to make of the whole thing yet.

[syndicated profile] verushka70tumblr_feed

dirtyzucchini:

allofthebeanz:

Hey guys, remember when Fraser said he thinks love at first sight happens and the shot focuses on Ray ‘so this love at first sight is that legit’ Kowalski? Like.. do you remember? Do we all remember that? WOW

INCREDIBLE. AMAZING. SHOWSTOPPING.

Whenever I think of this bold and beautiful and blatant queercoding I’m just so happy this show exists!

(no subject)

Jun. 29th, 2025 07:25 pm
[syndicated profile] verushka70tumblr_feed

posttexasstressdisorder:

lets-steal-an-archive:

Molly Knight posted on Bluesky on June 21, 2025:If you were too young in 2003 here is what Bush told the American people: 1) The Iraq War won’t cost a lot of money3) We won’t need a lot of troops4) We’ll bring peace and freedom to Iraq5) We’ll find WMDs6) We’ll be welcomed as liberators7) It will be easy8) It won’t take longAll lies.ALT

Likewise, if you were too young to remember Bush’s daddy sayin’ the same thing in ‘89….Dubya was just a followup.

[syndicated profile] verushka70tumblr_feed

humanpersonface:

I know that some British people take umbrage at Americans calling the Great British Bake Off relaxing, but it’s just because GBBO is such a different kind of stressful from American baking shows.

American baking shows will be called something like “Cupcake Knife Fight”, there’s horror movie lighting everywhere and dramatic stings every 5 seconds. All of the contestants are shit talking each other and fist fighting over the one single deep fryer provided by production. It will show the judges all whispering to each other at their super villain table overlooking the whole kitchen, and one will be like, “Oh my god. Everyone look at Brenda right now. She’s straight tanking it.” And it will cut to Brenda, who is running around covered in flour and crying and also bleeding for some reason. Then you get a clip from an interview with one of the contestants, and they’re like, “I really need to win this. Without this award money, I’m gonna need to close my restaurant, sell my dad, and live out of my car. AGAIN.” Then the giant digital doomsday clock overhead lets out a horrid klaxon, the judges tell half of them that their cupcakes taste disgusting, and one of them gets eliminated and sent to walk down the dramatically-lit shame hallway never to be seen again.

Meanwhile GBBO is in a lovely, brightly colored tent, there are delightful and friendly hosts/jesters there to keep everyone entertained, and all of the B Roll is of like… a bumblebee going into a flower, or a lamb running in a field. And yes, there will be moments where someone will mess up their timing or something, and they’ll be looking at their bake through the oven door like, “oh gosh I don’t think this will rise in time!” Then they stand up to find Paul Hollywood directly behind them ominously. His creepy whitewalker eyes will glow white, and he’ll say something like “the 12th of June. 2035. Drowning.” And his eyes will go back to normal and he’ll walk away. Then the baker gives a playful grimace to the camera and says “that didnt sound great, did it?”. Cut to a sweet looking older woman sipping tea on a stool and she says “oo I do hope that Prue enjoys the taste of my sugary, sticky baps!”. Then, at the end, someone gets a gold star for doing good, and the loser of the episode gets in the middle of a giant group hug. You see all of them at the end of the series at a giant carnival with their families and the post credits informs you that all of the contestants have become a Partridge Family-style traveling band and stayed friends forever.

[syndicated profile] verushka70tumblr_feed

transenbyhollis:

silvereyedowl:

folly-of-alexandria:

hoodiegal:

captain-price-unofficially:

Deep Blue is 30 years old and was capable of defeating chess grand champions. It could be housed in a single cabinet.


ChatGPT spans untold data centers devouring massive amounts of electricity and it got its ass whipped by an 8 bit gaming console from the 1970s.

…yeah? That’s not what it’s made for. If you take a hammer and a chainsaw and you compare which one is best for driving nails into a board, the chainsaw is gonna lose. Does this mean that the hammer is more technologically advanced? Or that the chainsaw has no use? No, of course not.

They were testing intelligence. When a company continuously markets its technology product as an intelligence supposedly capable of thought and reasoning, it makes sense to place it in a situation to see if it can follow a rule set and understand a game.

ChatGPT failed to recognize pieces it had been introduced to, failed to remember rules, repeated illegitimate moves, and demonstrated a general lack of ability to play chess on even a beginner level.

The AI showed a complete inability to understand a game.

The main takeaway from this test is that large statistical models lack any actual intelligence behind them contrary to the assertions made by companies developing them.

It has been stated before, but this simple test was just a way to illustrate it. As the Atari 2600 is noted to be quite weak in playing chess, generally only capable of think 1-2 moves ahead of its current turn. For a CGPT to be unable to meet even that level is notable.

#dipshits in the notes going

#WELL ACTUALLY chatgpt wasn’t DESIGNED for that so–

#yeah chatgpt wasn’t designed to DO much of anything we know it’s a grifting machine that’s what we’re saying

#WELL CHAPTGPT ISN’T MEANT TO BE GOOD AT STRATEGIC PLANNING AND THINKING AHEAD

#yeah. see that is in fact the problem

#because they are marketing this shit as an ‘assistant’ in making BUSINESS DECISIONS AND MEDICAL TREAMENT PLANS

#the point of this and why it’s important is that it’s illustrating what we already know

#which is that these 'ai’ nonsensebots are incapable of meaningfully processing information

#like this isn’t 'hammer bad at turning screws news at 11’

#this is 'snake-oil mystery box advertised as universal multitool that will revolutionize construction and put carpenters out of business

#demonstrably incapable of performing the basic functions of a hammer or screwdriver’

#the dunking is extremely relevant to the advertising and culture surrounding LLMs

i read the article, and the person doing this fully expected chatgpt to easily beat the atari. when it was unable to recognize pieces, he changed the visuals to make them easier to recognize. after that, he attempted to help chatgpt avoid mistakes. this person, who believed in the ability of chatgpt to play chess, says-

Regardless of whether we’re comparing specialized or general AI, its inability to retain a basic board state from turn to turn was very disappointing. Is that really any different from forgetting other crucial context in a conversation?

this was not an attempt to debunk the abilities of ai. he was talking to chatgpt, and it claimed to be a good chess player, and said it “wanted” to play chess against this atari machine. this person facilitated a match after being prompted by chatgpt, and was shocked to find that despite what it said, chatgpt does not even know how to play chess.

Profile

ride_4ever: made for me by oldtoadwoman (Default)
ride_4ever

June 2025

S M T W T F S
1234567
8910 11121314
15161718192021
222324 25 262728
2930     

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jun. 30th, 2025 12:52 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios